The exam is not technical and can be passed if you take the time and are serious about passing it. Follow the regime of an accredited patent prohibition preparation program, take lots of practice exams, and you'll have more than a 50% chance of passing it. But yes, I hurried with the FAQs because I knew what the frequently asked questions were about the prohibition of patents, since I had spoken to a lot of people about the exam. To represent clients before the United States Patent Office, it is necessary to take and pass the patent attorney exam.
For some time after the change, the Office did not ask much in relation to the first inventor to file, and then tried equally first to invent and first to archive, but in recent years the patent legal examination has almost abandoned first to invent questions in favor of asking exclusively (or almost exclusively) that only the first inventor submit the questions. Add to this the fact that those who qualify for the exam are engineers and scientists, a group of people who are not usually known for their widespread failures, and you can get an idea of how difficult it is to pass it. The online course is useful because of its instructional videos that summarize and explain the folder, but above all it is very useful for its hundreds of practical questions and for the previous exams of the Patent Bar Association of 2003, etc., in which all the answers are explained. For me, it's different because I studied a lot of substantive patent law subjects in law school (I got a JD certificate in Patent Law, worked at the Patent Clinic, etc.
It's the only way to ensure that you get the coverage you need, and unlike the state bar association, the course providers here have privileged information that you won't get outside of the course). Therefore, I encourage people to hurry up and do so before thinking about making the exam difficult to compensate for the great disadvantage it really represents. We recommend that students answer a minimum of 700 difficult exam-level questions after taking the PLI patent attorney review course. If you spend time studying, you'll find that some of the questions are relatively simple, such as simple applications of standards of the previous technique or basic data on patents, which take you about 30 seconds.
Like many other exams, the Patent Bar Association is just another search for paper for an old-school, thinly walled profession. I suppose that should be fine, since my degree in category A allowed me to pursue graduate studies in category A, but I would like to get confirmation of this before undertaking the non-trivial study for the patent attorney exam. I have also compiled all the information you need to know about the patent exam and preparation for the exam in the following links. For years before this update, the test had become obsolete to the point that almost 50% of the questions asked were repeated in old exams that the Office had made available to the public.
We continuously adjust the 2002 and 2003 exams so that the questions and answers remain good, practical questions of exam difficulty level based on current law that will be evaluated. While the 2003 exams are useful, the law and standards tested and published are extremely outdated, so studying on the basis of old exams has, at best, a marginal benefit. Two series of 50 multiple-choice questions every 3 hours covering any subject of the MPEP, which are available in PDF format in the exam.