This means that your invention must not have been made public—not even by yourself—before the application date, an inventive step. This means that your product or process must be a creative solution. As these criteria indicate, an inventor must pay attention to many different requirements in order to obtain a patent on an invention. For example, if you have someone manufacture or use your invention to determine if it is worthy of a patent and ends up applying for it after one year, the application may be denied because it is not new.
Before applying for a patent, you investigate the patentability of your invention and whether the invention meets the patent eligibility requirements of the U. Licensing requires the inventor to describe the invention in clear terms so that any expert in the field to which it relates can manufacture and use it without excessive experimentation after the patent expires. In addition to disclosing sufficient information to allow others to practice the claimed invention, the patent applicant must disclose the best mode of practicing the invention. This legal prohibition is relentless, meaning that an inventor who does not apply for patent protection for her new invention within this one-year grace period will lose all right to obtain patent protection on the invention.
In most cases, the utility requirement is easily met in the context of computer and electronic technologies. The novelty requires that the invention be different from the previous technique, which is comprehensive and includes all previous knowledge, uses, patents and publications in the field of the invention in question. A patent gives the patent holder the exclusive right to exclude others from manufacturing, using, importing, and selling the patented innovation for a limited period of time. A patent examiner may analyze an invention and think that it is simply the next logical step with respect to the previous technique, while another examiner may look at the same previous technique and think that the invention represents an inventive leap forward and is therefore not obvious.
Unfortunately, the actual test of patentability is a little more complicated than this phrase suggests. As you can imagine, determining whether a particular change or improvement is obvious is one of the most difficult determinations in patent law. patents are governed exclusively by federal law; federal district courts have original jurisdiction to hear all civil cases that arise under any federal patent law. Printed material can also be patentable if it relates to a physical invention and is new and useful or new and is not evident.
The requirement of patentable matter addresses the question of what types of inventions will be considered for patent protection. Therefore, if any of these three things occur in sale, public use, or printed publication one year before the application date, you cannot apply for a patent.
Leave a Comment